US Patent # 8,220,347 B2, US 9,291,531 B2 | Call Us Today! 1-614-504-6915


Available now - Mini Vapor Pin. Please make sure to read the SOP or the Mini Vapor Pin as it is a different installation that the original version. The Mini Vapor Pin comes as a set. SET INCLUDES: Mini Vapor Pin®, FLX-VPTM Barb with O-ring, Silicone Sleeve, and Mini Vapor Pin® Secure Cover with O-ring.
Order yours today!
... See MoreSee Less

Did you know that the Vapor Pin is a tool for..
1 - Locating VOC sources below hard surfaces
2 - Collecting high-resolution data sets
3 - Differential Pressure Testing
4 - Radon Mitigation Testing
5 - Stray Gas Evaluations
6 - Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling
7 - Long Term Monitoring
8 - Continuous Monitoring
9 - Vapor Intrusion Assessments
10 - Methane Sampling on Landfills
etc, etc., etc.,
Contact us for more information
... See MoreSee Less

METHODS AND TECHNIQUES IN THE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED AREAS. 3rd workshop successful. Thank you to all those who attended. #sitecharacterization #vaporpin #vaporpindobrasil ... See MoreSee Less

All set up and ready for the GOwen Environmental - Contaminated Site Management Outdoor Demonstration. ... See MoreSee Less

Happy Memorial Day Weekend! Thank you to those who served and who are serving. ... See MoreSee Less

Radon in Schools: Despite state and federal recommendations, only 53 of 331 school districts in Minnesota report they have tested classrooms for radon since 2012. KARE 11 found out which Twin Cities area districts are testing – and which ones are not.

Hollywood recognizes Radon: Shantel VanSanten has turned a personal tragedy into a catalyst for helping others. After her grandmother passed, VanSanten and her family looked for answers, and were shocked at what they found. “We searched to understand what the cause was, and we found it was from radon poisoning, which was found in [her] basement.”
... See MoreSee Less

Are you attending @TCEQEVENTS? Stop by and see whats new at Booth 525 ... See MoreSee Less

Stop by to see us next week at TCEQ -Booth 525 or Show of the South Booth #319 ... See MoreSee Less

Thank you to everyone who took the time to attend our Battelle learning lab at the Battelle Chlorinated conference today. We appreciate your time and wonderful questions. #battelle2018 ... See MoreSee Less

Main Content


Please click on the following information to learn more about how the Vapor Pin® can assist in your field testing

Why does my Vapor Pin® fail a helium leak test?

We can’t rule out leakage, but it’s rare with Vapor Pins®, and if you detect helium at multiple sample points, it might be caused by false positives from methane. Most helium detectors respond positively to methane. Similarly, high concentrations of C5-C12 hydrocarbons in soil gas have been reported to cause false positives in helium detectors. Methane generation is common when oxygen is depleted by high concentrations or large sources of hydrocarbons, especially in petroleum products containing ethanol. This is one of the reasons that Cox-Colvin encourages leak testing via mechanical means, as described in our SOP Leak Testing the Vapor Pin® via Mechanical Means (located under our Resources Page), and as discussed in the Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC), 2014 Petroleum Vapor Intrusion guidance. If you do use a helium leak detector, we recommend using a model that does not respond to methane, and test the soil gas for false positives before applying helium.

What Are Shipping Options?

At checkout, shipping choices will be listed in a dropdown list after you enter your address and zipcode.

Fedex Express picks up 4:00 PM Ground picks up 9:00 am EST.

You could also go to determine transit times.  Put in our zipcode for where its coming from (43064) and enter your shipping zipcode destination.

Distributors in Australia, Brazil, Canada and Europe

We currently have Distributors in Australia, Brazil, Canada and Europe.

For Australia orders –


6/339 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, Victoria 3207

P (03) 8683 0091  | F (03) 9681 9421

For Brazil orders


USA | Central America | South America

For Canada orders
Contact Hoskin Scientific
Burlington, Ontario – Serving Ontario and Maritime provinces
4210 Morris Drive,
Burlington, ON L7L 5L6
Toll Free (800) 665-5871
Email –

For Europe orders
Contact Mark Byrne – Ribble Group
Ribble Enviro – Unit 4 Gisburn Business Park,
Gisburn, Clitheroe, BB7 4JP, UK
Toll Free 01200 445 804
Email –>



What are the Metric Measurements for installing the Vapor Pin®?

Use 16mm for the pin and 38mm for the covers, we suggest 400mm cutting length for both sizes.

Does the Vapor Pin® connect to Swagelok fittings?

The FLX-VP was specifically designed to connect to a variety of other devices including Swagelok compression fittings. The standard Swagelok connection for 1/4” OD Nylaflow and Teflon tubing, and for TO-17 sorbent tubes is available through the Vapor Pin® website (Part Number SL_FLX1_Fitting). Replacement ferrule sets are also available.

Soil Gas Siloxane Contamination

First and foremost, there may be specifics required by regulators in your state…by in general…

Silicone tubing is more reactive than harder tubing, which is to say that Silicone, and softer tubing generally, is more prone to absorbing and outgassing organic compounds.  Greg Ouellette’s 2004 Soil Vapor Sampling and Analysis – Lessons Learned, DOE/PERF Soil Vapor Workshop, Brea, CA Jan. 27-29, is one of several reports that demonstrates the higher reactivity of soft tubing, this is out of context for our application.  Ouellette drew vapors through 50 ft of Tygon tubing, which has approximately 85 square inches in contact with soil gas.  In the case of the Vapor Pin®, the only contact between soft tubing (Silicone) and soil gas is the cross sectional area between the slab and the bottom of the pin, which is 0.11 square inches.  I think we also agree that while Silicone would absorb some VOCs, the tubing would reach equilibrium at some point and stop absorbing vapors.

We test the Silicone tubing when it arrives by drawing ambient air through the entire 50 ft lengths with a PID, and record the readings.  The tubing does contain a few ppm of vapors in the first few days, specifically siloxanes, which are not on any vapor intrusion list.  We continue to test for several days until the entire length of tubing contributes less than 1 ppm of VOCs.  We then cut the tubing into short lengths and let them continue to air before sending them.

They are relatively obscure issues such as what kind of helium to use during leak testing, or whether to use barbed versus compression fittings, when most of the problems boil down to a few issues:

1)      Run a shut-in leak test on the assembled canister & regulator, as described in  ASTM D7663-11, before going to the field.  Leak test the assembled sample train on site, except for the connection to the Vapor Pin® or equivalent point with a hand-held vacuum pump or peristaltic.  Last, connect the sample train to the sub-slab point and leak test it the point.  Helium works, but we use distilled water.  That’s a problem if the point leaks, but I’ve never seen it with the Vapor Pin®.  We also check the regulator flow rate prior the shut-in test, but an improper flow rate is more likely to result in no sample than an invalid sample.  We’ve developed our own techniques if you’re interested.  Also, documenting your test results and presenting them to the lab improves your credibility and keeps them on their toes.  Even the best labs occasionally provide faulty equipment.

2)      Minimize the lengths of soft tubing by butting up the harder tubing or hardware against each other as close as possible.  We find compression fittings more likely to leak, not less.

3)      Avoid incompetent labs if you have a choice.

4)      Collect an adequate number of samples to evaluate spatial heterogeneity.  This may be the most important part.  At least when working near sources, we’ve repeatedly found that the primary source isn’t where we expected it to be, and our best guess would have provided concentrations that are orders of magnitude lower than maximum.  The only solution is to drill lots of holes, which is practical with the Vapor Pin®.  I’ve personally installed as many as 56 in a day, and my younger coworkers have hit 90.  In many cases you can screen them with a PID and collect a select few for lab analysis.

Please refer to our White Papers under resources for additional information.  One with the Michigan DEQ in which we installed four Vapor Pin® next to their “conventional” sub-slab points (Swagelok fittings set in cement).  They used a variety of labs, sample containers, and analytical methods over the course of months.  But any way we cut it, when we plot the Vapor Pin® against conventional points, we get a good correlation.  The second white paper was done in conjunction with H&P labs in San Diego.  Their sub-slab points, as described in the CA guidance, amount to miniature monitor wells, complete with sand packs and screens.  They collected 10 sample pairs, and again, the correlation is excellent.  In spite of all the issues concerning the Silicone sleeves, the Tygon used to make connections, and others issues we haven’t touched on, the fact that we get the same results over a broad range of concentrations and compounds proves that the Vapor Pins® does what it’s designed to do.