- Contact Us
- View our Products
- My Account
Please click on the following information to learn more about how the Vapor Pin® can assist in your field testing
The first and most simple answer is to check out our Standard Operating Procedures and select the product of your choosing!
For a first-time user of the Vapor Pin® Sampling Device, which of the following samples are you completing?
Are you completing a grab sample or are you doing an extended sample study?
If you answered, Grab sample, we would suggest the Brass Vapor Pin® Sampling Device.
If you answered, an extended study, we would suggest the Stainless Steel Vapor Pin® Sampling Device.
Note: The Brass Vapor Pin® Sampling Device may also be used for extended time periods. If you do, be aware that brass is more susceptible to corrosion. Also, Stainless Steel FLX Vapor Pin® is another product available that provides a flexible way to sample!
Please always refer to your regulators!
To understand what you need for a point and for the most bang for your buck the Vapor Pin® Sets demonstrate what you need for a single point grab sample, assuming you already have an Installation/Extraction Tool.
Note: The Vapor Pin® Sets are the most cost-efficient when sampling five or fewer points.
For first-time users looking at what is included in a Vapor Pin® Contractors Kit will be most beneficial for understanding what is needed for flush mount installations.
Vapor Pin® Sampling Devices are manufactured with a female thread at the bottom specifically for attaching a barbed adapter, available on the Vapor Pin® website. The barbed adapter allows you to attach tubing to the bottom of the Vapor Pin® Sampling Device to increase sample depth, to add a particulate filter such as an aquarium bubbler, etc. The barbed adapter has the same size barb as on the top of the Vapor Pin® Sampling Device and fits the same tubing.
You can also increase the sample depth with the Vapor Pin® Extension, which also screws into the bottom of the Vapor Pin® Sampling Device. The extension has male threads at the top and female threads at the bottom, allowing you to screw them together to extend the sample depth as much as desired in 1.5-inch increments.
Vapor Pin® has developed a particulate filter that can be screwed directly to the bottom of the Vapor Pin® Sampling Device. This device is called the Vapor Pin® Filter.
The Vapor Pin® Sampling Device and its accessories are evolving rapidly to keep pace with customer needs. Please feel free to call us to discuss the latest developments, cost, and availability.
The typical use of the Brass Vapor Pin® sampling devices are for temporary installations (one-time sampling) and stainless steel for long-term installations (repeated sampling), due to the superior corrosion resistance of stainless steel. If there is any doubt, we recommend purchasing stainless-steel pins, as the additional cost is a small part of overall costs, particularly after the Vapor Pin® sampling device has been used multiple times.
We’re not aware of another device quite like the patented Vapor Pin® sampling device. Other types of sub-slab sampling devices installed with cement are available, and some practitioners construct their own from plumbing parts. But the cost of locating parts, problems with leakage, and the fact that once installed, they normally can’t be reused, makes them more costly in the long run. We believe the Vapor Pin® sampling device will become the new standard for sub-slab vapor sampling because it’s easy and quick to install and use, it can be used over and over, and it provides quality samples with little or no leakage.
The Vapor Pin® sampling device is designed to be used in slabs that are at least three inches thick. If the Vapor Pin® sampling device will be installed as a flush mount, we suggest that the slab be at least four inches thick. Because the Vapor Pin® sampling device does not have to extend to the bottom of the slab, there is no maximum slab thickness, provided your drill bit is long enough to drill into the sub-slab. A 5/8-inch drill bit with a length of 24 inches covers most situations.
Installation of the Vapor Pin® sampling device will result in a 1.5-inch diameter hole (flush mount installation) or a 5/8-inch hole (stick-up installation). After the Vapor Pin® sampling device is removed the hole should be patched with hydraulic cement. Beyond this, there should be no damage to the floor, and the Vapor Pin® causes no more damage than other methods of sub-slab sampling.
If properly installed with its protective cap, there will be no vapor leakage into the structure through the Vapor Pin® sampling device. Our experience, and that of our customers, is that the Vapor Pin® sampling device is less likely to leak than other devices.
Yes. The Vapor Pin® sampling device can stay in place as long as necessary. For repeated use, we recommend a flush mount installation using a stainless steel Vapor Pin® sampling device to protect the pin from damage and corrosion. Keep in mind that the flush mount cap is not watertight and should not remain in place in areas subject to contaminant spills. If future sampling is not required, the Vapor Pin® sampling device should be removed and the hole in the slab filled with hydraulic cement.
Vapor Pin® sampling device decontamination is described in the standard operating procedure(SOP), and consists of removing and discarding the silicone sleeve and protective cap, cleaning the Vapor Pin® sampling device in an alconox or equivalent solution, rinsing thoroughly, and heating it to a temperature of 130°C.
Yes – the Vapor Pin® sampling device is designed to be re-used after removal from the slab. Our scientists have used some Vapor Pin® sampling devices at least a dozen times, with no obvious signs of wear. The sleeve and the protective cap should be replaced between locations, and the Vapor Pin® sampling device should be properly decontaminated in accordance with the standard operating procedure(SOP).
We use peroxide-cured silicone tubing with the Vapor Pin® sampling device. Our studies indicate that the tubing does not affect the sample results. The tubing surrounds the bottom half of the pin forming the seal between the 5/8-inch hole and the Vapor Pin® sampling device. Sub-slab vapors are exposed to very little of the silicone tubing. Side-by-side comparisons with conventional sample points indicate that no vapors are added to or subtracted from soil gas by the silicone sleeve. Additionally, Vapor Pin® enterprises screens the silicone tubing upon arrival to ensure that sleeves with elevated levels of VOCs are not sent to customers.
The applicable guidance document might specify a particular number of purge volumes, but two or three volumes are commonly recommended. For the Vapor Pin® sampling device, one purge volume is equal to: 0.83 milliliters (ml) for the Vapor Pin®, plus 5.0 ml for each inch of the hole beneath the Vapor Pin® sampling device, plus 0.42 ml for each inch of tubing, if using 1/4-inch OD nylaflow LM, plus the internal volume of any other fittings or hardware in the sample train.
If you wish to calculate purge volume on the basis of equipment dimensions, the Vapor Pin® has a total length of 3.25 inches, of which 2 inches are inside the 5/8-inch hole in the slab, and 1.25 inches are above the 5/8-inch hole. The inner diameter (ID) of the Vapor Pin® sampling device is 0.187 inches. The nylaflow LM tubing has an outer diameter (OD) of 0.25 inches and an ID of 0.187 inches. The tygon™ tubing has an OD of 0.312 inches and an ID of 0.187 inches. Bear in mind that the tygon™ tubing will expand in use, and because it should be used in short lengths to minimize contact with soil gas, its ID will typically not be part of the purge-volume calculation.
Vapor Pin® prefers to purge soil gas with a combination photo-ionization detector (PID) and oxygen (O2) meter and collects the sample after the PID and O2 levels stabilize, which indicates the presence of soil gas. VOCs and O2 typically stabilize after purging 50 ml to 100 ml of soil gas, which, depending on slab thickness and tubing length, generally equals around three purge volumes.
As with all vapor-intrusion sampling, you’re encouraged to follow applicable guidance requirements. Cox-Colvin prefers to leak test the sub-slab sample point (Vapor Pin®) with distilled water, and the remaining sample train (canister, tubing, and fittings) via vacuum, as described in the Standard Operating Procedure Leak Testing the Vapor Pin® sampling device via Mechanical Means. Of course, the Vapor Pin® sampling device can also be leak tested with helium or other tracer gases, the same as with other sub-slab sample points. If the method of leak testing is not specified, an alternative can be the water dam.
Conduct leak tests in accordance with applicable guidance. If the method of leak testing is not specified, an alternative can be the water dam and vacuum pump, as described in SOP Leak Testing the VAPOR PIN® via Mechanical Means. For flush-mount installations, distilled water can be poured directly into the 1 1/2 inch (38mm) hole.
Under normal circumstances with proper installation through a concrete slab, the Vapor Pin® sampling device provides an air-tight seal. Cox-Colvin has leak tested the Vapor Pin® sampling device with helium; with 99% helium in the leak-test shroud, no helium (<50 ppm) was detected in soil gas. In some situations, such as a thin concrete slab or cracked and degraded concrete, or a hole greater than 5/8-inch diameter, may result in a poor seal. We recommend leak testing as part of the sampling procedure.
Most Summa-type canisters and regulators are equipped with Swagelok™ compression fittings which connect to 1/4-inch outer diameter (OD) tubing, including Nylaflow, with Swagelok™ ferrules and a hexagonal nut. The nut can be reused, but the ferrules are not, except on stainless steel tubing. Many laboratories will provide Swagelok™ ferrules that fit their sample canisters at a nominal cost.
Because the Vapor Pin was designed to be rugged and compatible with other sampling hardware, it has a nominal 1/4-inch barbed fitting at the top. Like other barbed fittings, it is actually somewhat larger than 1/4 inch in diameter, so the Vapor Pin™ is joined to semi-rigid tubing, e.g. Nylaflow, with a short piece of soft tubing. Cox-Colvin offers Tygon™ R-3063 tubing to make these connections. Tygon™ offers better chemical resistance than other soft tubing, but is pliable enough to make a tight seal. The Tygon™ tubing is placed between the Vapor Pin® sampling device and the semi-rigid tubing and fits over both of them. Pressure gauges, tee fittings, and other devices with a 1/4-inch barb can be attached to the sample train with Tygon™ tubing. The sample train can also be assembled with compression fittings if desired, but the additional ferrules required at each connection adds to sampling time and costs. Also, in our experience, barbed fittings are less likely to leak than compression fittings, especially under negative pressure. In fact, Missouri’s 2004 vapor-intrusion guidance discourages compression fittings at all points except at the sample canister, due to their tendency to leak.
Tygon™ has better chemical resistance than softer tubing, such as silicone, but silicone’s high flexibility allows connecting devices of different diameters. Silicone can also be penetrated with a hypodermic syringe for some types of sampling, after which the tubing automatically seals the hole. As with all environmental sampling, make sure your equipment complies with regulatory requirements and Data Quality Objectives.
Please notice that chemical interference from tubing is dependent upon many factors, but tubing is more likely to contribute hydrocarbons than chlorinated compounds. To minimize the risk of chemical interference from all tubing, reduce tubing lengths as far as possible, particularly soft tubing, and keep tubing away from vapor sources during storage and transport.
Theoretically, stainless steel is best because it has the lowest reactivity (e.g., it’s less likely to absorb or give off vapors), but flexible plastic tubing is the norm because it’s easier to handle, more affordable, and entirely satisfactory if proper precautions are followed. In general, softer tubing is the more reactive than harder tubing. Semi-rigid Nylon and Teflon tubing are most widely recommended for soil-gas sampling, but others might be acceptable, depending on the applicable guidance.
Most or all Summa-type canisters, and many other sample containers and fittings, are designed to accept 1/4-inch outer diameter (OD) tubing. Cox-Colvin offers 1/4-inch OD, Nylaflow LM, which has superior chemical resistance to generic nylon tubing and is less costly than Teflon. Poly tubing’s chemical reactivity makes it inappropriate for vapor-intrusion sampling, but it might be suitable for high-concentration vapors near source areas. All plastic tubing should be replaced between samples, and stored and handled away from vapor sources. Soft tubing, such as Tygon™, is recommended only for making connections between semi-rigid tubing and other devices, as discussed below.
Because the Vapor Pin® sampling device does not require the use of grout, it can be sampled as soon as the sub-slab soil gas has reached equilibration. The period of time may be prescribed by your particular guidance, but can be as little as 20 minutes following installation, since Vapor Pin™ installations result in very short hole-open times.
We use a hammer drill manufactured by Hilti (TE 50 Deluxe Grounded Combihammer, item # 383916), with hammer drill bits TE-YX 5/8 inch x 22 inch (item # 206514) and TE-YX 1-1/2 inch x 23 inch (item # 293032). Available by calling 1-800-879-8000 or by clicking here. Comparable drills and bits are available from other manufacturers as well.
For metric measurements – Use 16mm for the pin and 38mm for the covers., we suggest 400mm cutting length for both sizes.
The Vapor Pin® sampling device is installed easily using common hand tools. We recommend purchase of the Vapor Pin® Kit, which includes just about everything required for 10 Vapor Pin™ installations. The only tools needed (in addition to the Vapor Pin® Kit) are a hammer drill and appropriate bits, and a dead blow hammer. See the Vapor Pin® standard operating procedure (SOP) for details. Grout or other adhesives are NOT required.
The Vapor Pin® sampling device can be installed in the stick-up configuration in less than five minutes. Installation in the flush-mount configuration requires an additional two or three minutes.
We recommend you screw the Vapor Pin® sampling device into the installation tool, and push the sleeve over the lower end of the Vapor Pin® sampling device. The optional elastrator tool eases this process, by placing the elastrator tips into the end of the silicone sleeve and squeezing the tool’s handle to open the sleeve as you push it onto the Vapor Pin® sampling device. We polish Vapor Pins® prior to shipment to reduce sharp edges, but you should still wear work gloves while installing the sleeve.
Vapor Pin® kits are available in four variations. The standard Vapor Pin® kit consists of the following items, all conveniently contained in a hard-sided carrying case: 10 Vapor Pins® (brass or stainless steel); 20 silicone sleeves, 20 Vapor Pin® caps, 10 plastic flush mount covers; 1 installation/extraction tool; 1 brush; 1 water dam for leak testing; and 1 Vapor Pin® standard operating procedure.
The contractor kit contains the same equipment as the standard kit, plus 1 stainless steel drilling guide, 10 secure flush mount covers (in place of 10 plastic covers), and 1 spanner screwdriver for installing and removing the secure covers. The contractor kit offers more protection from damage or tampering than the standard kit, but either can be used for flush mount or stick-up installations.
We recommend that you initially purchase a Vapor Pin® kit to ensure all required components are obtained. Afterward, individual components of the kit can be purchased as needed. Sample tubing also is available separately. Also available separately is the elastrator tool, which simplifies the process of placing the silicone sleeve onto the Vapor Pin® prior to installation.
The Vapor Pin® sampling device was designed for use in vapor intrusion studies as well as source delineation. We suggest that your applicable guidance be consulted to obtain appropriate leak detection procedures, soil gas flow rates, appropriate sample containers, and appropriate length of the sampling period. The Vapor Pin® sampling device should be left in place if multiple rounds of sampling are required. Many states specifically allow the use of the Vapor Pin® for vapor intrusion sampling, but we recommend you consult the guidance for your state or jurisdiction to be sure.
Yes, the Vapor Pin® sampling device is designed to be installed in the stick-up or flush mount configuration. We recommend the Vapor Pin® sampling device be installed in the stick-up configuration if it will be used for a single sampling event and then removed, and in the flush-mount configuration if it will be left in place for repeated sampling. Plastic flush-mount covers are supplied with the Vapor Pin® Kit, but stainless steel secure covers are also available and provide more protection from damage or tampering. The standard operating procedure (SOP) use of the Vapor Pin® drilling guide and secure cover describes the flush-mount installation procedure. As described in the SOP, the optional drilling guide simplifies flush-mount installation and increases the accuracy of hole depth and location.
The Vapor Pin® sampling device provides a means of transmitting soil gas through the slab so that it can be sampled. The particular suite of VOCs that will be reported is dependent on the analytical method employed by your laboratory.
The Vapor Pin® sampling device is superior to other sub-slab vapor sampling methods because: 1) it’s constructed of a single piece of metal, eliminating potential leak points; 2) it’s installed in minutes using common hand tools; 3) it uses a silicone sleeve to form an air-tight seal between the Vapor Pin® sampling device and the side of the borehole, eliminating the need for grout or other adhesives; and 4) unlike other sampling devices, it’s easily retrieved for reuse.
First and foremost, there may be specifics required by regulators in your state…by in general…
Silicone tubing is more reactive than harder tubing, which is to say that Silicone, and softer tubing generally, is more prone to absorbing and outgassing organic compounds. Greg Ouellette’s 2004 Soil Vapor Sampling and Analysis – Lessons Learned, DOE/PERF Soil Vapor Workshop, Brea, CA Jan. 27-29, is one of several reports that demonstrates the higher reactivity of soft tubing, this is out of context for our application. Ouellette drew vapors through 50 ft of Tygon tubing, which has approximately 85 square inches in contact with soil gas. In the case of the Vapor Pin®, the only contact between soft tubing (Silicone) and soil gas is the cross sectional area between the slab and the bottom of the pin, which is 0.11 square inches. I think we also agree that while Silicone would absorb some VOCs, the tubing would reach equilibrium at some point and stop absorbing vapors.
We test the Silicone tubing when it arrives by drawing ambient air through the entire 50 ft lengths with a PID, and record the readings. The tubing does contain a few ppm of vapors in the first few days, specifically siloxanes, which are not on any vapor intrusion list. We continue to test for several days until the entire length of tubing contributes less than 1 ppm of VOCs. We then cut the tubing into short lengths and let them continue to air before sending them.
They are relatively obscure issues such as what kind of helium to use during leak testing, or whether to use barbed versus compression fittings, when most of the problems boil down to a few issues:
1) Run a shut-in leak test on the assembled canister & regulator, as described in ASTM D7663-11, before going to the field. Leak test the assembled sample train on site, except for the connection to the Vapor Pin® sampling device or equivalent point with a hand-held vacuum pump or peristaltic. Last, connect the sample train to the sub-slab point and leak test it the point. Helium works, but we use distilled water. That’s a problem if the point leaks, but I’ve never seen it with the Vapor Pin® sampling device. We also check the regulator flow rate prior the shut-in test, but an improper flow rate is more likely to result in no sample than an invalid sample. We’ve developed our own techniques if you’re interested. Also, documenting your test results and presenting them to the lab improves your credibility and keeps them on their toes. Even the best labs occasionally provide faulty equipment.
2) Minimize the lengths of soft tubing by butting up the harder tubing or hardware against each other as close as possible. We find compression fittings more likely to leak, not less.
3) Avoid incompetent labs if you have a choice.
4) Collect an adequate number of samples to evaluate spatial heterogeneity. This may be the most important part. At least when working near sources, we’ve repeatedly found that the primary source isn’t where we expected it to be, and our best guess would have provided concentrations that are orders of magnitude lower than maximum. The only solution is to drill lots of holes, which is practical with the Vapor Pin®. I’ve personally installed as many as 56 in a day, and my younger coworkers have hit 90. In many cases you can screen them with a PID and collect a select few for lab analysis.
Please refer to our White Papers under resources for additional information. One with the Michigan DEQ in which we installed four Vapor Pin® sampling device next to their “conventional” sub-slab points (Swagelok fittings set in cement). They used a variety of labs, sample containers, and analytical methods over the course of months. But any way we cut it, when we plot the Vapor Pin® against conventional points, we get a good correlation. The second white paper was done in conjunction with H&P labs in San Diego. Their sub-slab points, as described in the CA guidance, amount to miniature monitor wells, complete with sand packs and screens. They collected 10 sample pairs, and again, the correlation is excellent. In spite of all the issues concerning the Silicone sleeves, the Tygon used to make connections, and others issues we haven’t touched on, the fact that we get the same results over a broad range of concentrations and compounds proves that the Vapor Pin® sampling devices does what it’s designed to do.
The FLX-VP was specifically designed to connect to a variety of other devices including Swagelok compression fittings. The standard Swagelok connection for 1/4” OD Nylaflow and Teflon tubing, and for TO-17 sorbent tubes is available through the Vapor Pin® sampling device website (Part Number SL_FLX1_Fitting). Replacement ferrule sets are also available.
Use 16mm for the pin and 38mm for the covers, we suggest 400mm cutting length for both sizes.
We currently have Distributors in Australia, Brazil and Canada.
For Australia orders –
For Australia orders –
ERR – Environmental Remediation Resources Pty Ltd
F4 / 13-15 Kevlar Close (Postal: PO Box 425)
Braeside VIC 3195
Phone: +61 3 9555 3800
For Brazil orders
USA | Central America | South America
For Canada orders
Contact Hoskin Scientific
Burlington, Ontario – Serving Ontario and Maritime provinces
4210 Morris Drive,
Burlington, ON L7L 5L6
Toll Free (800) 665-5871
Email salesb@Hoskin.ca – www.hoskin.ca
For Europe orders
Contact Mark Byrne – Ribble Group
Ribble Enviro – Unit 4 Gisburn Business Park,
Gisburn, Clitheroe, BB7 4JP, UK
Toll Free 01200 445 804
Email M.Byrne@ribble-enviro.co.uk – www.ribble-enviro-co.uk/a>
You can order from our friends at Professional Discount Supplies!
At checkout, shipping choices will be listed in a dropdown list after you enter your address and zipcode.
Fedex Express picks up 4:00 PM Ground picks up 9:00 am EST.
You could also go Fedex.com to determine transit times. Put in our zipcode for where its coming from (43064) and enter your shipping zipcode destination.
We can’t rule out leakage, but it’s rare with Vapor Pin® sampling device, and if you detect helium at multiple sample points, it might be caused by false positives from methane. Most helium detectors respond positively to methane. Similarly, high concentrations of C5-C12 hydrocarbons in soil gas have been reported to cause false positives in helium detectors. Methane generation is common when oxygen is depleted by high concentrations or large sources of hydrocarbons, especially in petroleum products containing ethanol. This is one of the reasons that Cox-Colvin encourages leak testing via mechanical means, as described in our SOP Leak Testing the Vapor Pin® sampling device via Mechanical Means (located under our Resources Page), and as discussed in the Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC), 2014 Petroleum Vapor Intrusion guidance. If you do use a helium leak detector, we recommend using a model that does not respond to methane, and test the soil gas for false positives before applying helium.